From the Ashes

June 26th, 2009

The two brothers who were arrested earlier in the month in the case of Phoenix, the pitbull who was severely burned and later had to be euthanized, have been rearrested and charge as adults, according to the Baltimore Sun.  According to baltimoresun.com, the two have been charged as adults for possession of drugs and firearms found inside their homes in a subsequent search after their initial arrest.

While it may be comforting to some that the two will almost certainly do jail time as adults for this latest round of charges, in the truest sense of justice it isn’t enough.  Earlier in the month, Governor O’Malley asked the state to review the animal cruelty law in Marlyand after this case and another in which a cat was found tortured.  These crimes against animals represent the worst of the human spirit: causing pain and suffering to a living creature that is completely dependent and mostly defenseless.  It’s darker than dog fighting, which is already inexcusable.  For these kids to go to jail for some pot and a couple of guns, and to be tried as juveniles in their case of animal abuse, is the system collapsing on itself.  I’m glad O’Malley has recognized that the state laws in these cases may be inadequate, but it’s an example of reactionary politics and playing the good-guy for the media (even if he truly does believe it’s a good idea).

No, rather, I think these kids should be tried as adults on these latest charges, and that charges in the case of Phoenix should be held off until the end of the statute of limitations in the hopes that stiffer penalties can be associated with this kind of heinous crime.  Let them wallow in jail for a while and see if the bigger inmates think it’s fun to play with them.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

Iranical

June 24th, 2009

In the last year or so, disputed elections and the violence that has followed them have been a frequent visitor to our news pages and television shows. With Kenya’s election disputes and riots in what had been one of the few (relatively) stable African countries, and now with the protests in the post-Iran election controversy, it has become a standard story arc that we’ve seen play out before.

While violence is almost always deplorable, the obvious reason we have an interest in the outcome of Iran’s election is that Iran is kinda the Fonz of the Muslim world: other countries and/or para-military groups are going to look to the leadership of Iran’s position on the United States as a starting point for their own policies and actions. This is why President Obama has condemned the violent overreaction as a tragic loss of unnecessary life and a sad state of human affairs, but he hasn’t taken stronger language. Whoever comes out of this political swamp, and it looks like it almost undoubtedly will be Ahmadinejad, Obama is going to have to work towards a US-Iran relationship where neither party is going to stab the other in the back. He can’t do that if he berates the guy in charge, but he can condemn the tragedies that are unfolding on the news at the hands of the Republican Guard.

It’s funny to think that a short 9 years ago, the US had it’s own disputed election. And while the heart of our election wasn’t whether we were going to be a sham democracy or not, it was nonetheless a crucial turning point in our nation’s history. And there were loud, passionate protest, both in word and in deed. For those that are calling for more extreme measures in response to Iran’s situation management, what would those people have called for in response to the protests at home back in 2000 if they had become violent? US protests aren’t frequently violent because too many of the people involved have too much to lose. But if they had been, if the nation’s capital had been overrun by soccermoms wielding broken strollers or liberal law students attacking in droves, how would the National Guard have reacted?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

Step One: Secure a Crony – Check

June 23rd, 2009

Today, Ronald Lipscomb, a Harbor East developer, pled guilty to a lesser charge instead of going on trial for bribery. It’s really not too surprising, as most white-collar criminals just aren’t cut out for long period of prison time.

What’s of the most interest, however, is that part of Lipscomb’s deal is to cooperate with the state prosecutor’s case against the mayor. As more evidence than a couple of gift cards mounts against Dixon, she will be more subject additional pressures above and beyond the day-to-day difficulties of running a major US city with a mounting crime problem.

In addition to Lipscomb admitting to illegal campaign finance activity with City Councilwoman Helen Holton, The Baltimore Sun is reporting that John Paterakis, owner of H&S Bakery and a significant portion of Inner Harbor East, had his name mentioned in connection with the case. So, with Lipscomb in tow, two prominent Baltimore figures – a developer and a councilwoman – the state prosecutor is setting his sights on a slightly larger member of the food chain. Probably a step closer to Dixon at the top.

Dixon’s lawyer Arnold Weiner today dismissed the idea that Lipscomb represented any threat to the mayor’s credibility, saying his testimony in the future would be “of no concern.” Really?  I’m sure State Prosecutor’s make deals with people that don’t know anything all the time.

Guess maybe Dixon has her own Stop Snitchin video out there somewhere.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

Paper or Plastic

June 17th, 2009

Last week I talked about changes to Baltimore’s trash and recycling programs, and encouraged the idea that the city has to hold up its end of the bargain with regards to what can be recycled.

The city is currently debating a 25 cent per bag tax on plastic bags.  There are apparently mixed emotions over this idea as well, with City Council President Stephanie Rawlings-Blake opposed, along with several vocal business owners and residents.  Complaints over the logistics of charging people per bag, the tough economy already impacting shoppers bottom lines, and other issues were all brought up as reasons why the bag tax is counter-productive to the interests of businesses in the city.

But the fact of the matter is that just like vice taxes on tobacco products or alcohol, plastic bags are becoming an issue nationwide.  And there are easy alternatives.  For the most part, small shopping trips will fit quite easily into one or two reusable bags.  Many clothing stores already package their goods in paper bags, which the city collects in curbside recycling.  And for people like Rob Santoni of Santoni’s Supermarkets who raised issues with legislation on the table, take the opportunity to make your store the good guy, and give away reusable bags with every purchase over X amount for a week.  And make sure they say “Santoni’s” on them, and take it out of the advertising budget.

Is this an example of Big Government stepping in and limiting personal freedoms?  No, this is an example of good government recognizing that certain small conveniences are slowly adding up to large problems, and attempting to put a solution in place.  Sure, for those large shopping trips where you have 10 bags full of food, it’ll cost you an extra $2.50 on the $100 you’re already spending.  But the prices (non-metaphorical) that we’ll be paying to try and clean up all of the things we’re throwing away these days will add up to a lot more than that.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

Unnecessary Buzz

June 17th, 2009

Seriously.  Why are people talking about killing flies?  I don’t think I need to bother to link to any video excerpts, they’re all over the internet and undeserving in the first place.  Our Commander-in-Chief killed a fly.  Last time I checked, he wasn’t a buddhist so I doubt this is any serious breach of personal ethics.

But here’s the bigger point.  Last week, I made the point that Congress needs to focus on important, essential work, rather that petulant, petty politics.  The media needs to hear the same message.  Since Obama’s inauguration, the media has felt the need to make every ‘first’ a parade-worthy news item.  The fact is, the ‘first insect-killing by an African-American President’ isn’t news worthy.  It’s barely YouTube worthy. (Sidenote: At the time of this writing, despite the video of the fly assassination being listed as a “Hot Topic” on the front page of The Baltimore Sun’s web page, it isn’t anywhere on the front page of YouTube).

We rely on the media to keep us informed on important events.  Spending time on grading the first 100 days of the Presidency (or any other arbitrary chronological mark), the adoption of a first dog, or the smashing of a small insect, takes away from coverage of important issues like Obama’s announcement of benefits for same-sex partners, Iranian election controversy, or any other world news event that could possibly affect the lives of the people engaged by the media.  I mean, really, I know American Idol is over but I promise there is still news-worthy material out there.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

Shut Up…Get to Work

June 10th, 2009

CNN reports today that several Republicans, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, are dissatisfied with the scheduling of confirmation hearings for Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor. This includes whining that the timeframe is the “shortest” of its kind, and that the proper Republicans were not consulted in scheduling the process. First of all – boo hiss. The times they are a-changin’, and you’re not going to get to choose the icing on your cake all the time. That being said, CNN disproves the claims on record speed of confirmation hearings with a list of the timeframes for many of the most recent Court nominees. If you’re going to bandy about superlatives, make sure you’re accurate.

But more importantly (because we all know public figures exaggerate to make a point even when they know fact checking will subsequently prove them wrong) there is an essential flaw with the logic espoused here by the Senatorial-Right. The lack of efficiency in government is often maligned, not just by the public at large, but by those who clamor for fiscal conservatism. Here is the rub: Public Officials – we expect you to work, not just hobnob over cigars and scotch and bang interns. This means doing things quickly. We all go to work, sometimes work overtime, to get things done. Especially during crunch time. If you hadn’t noticed, this is crunch time in America.

Now, I’m not advocating glossing over things that are important (read: not off-hand remarks about where your character comes from). This could potentially be the reverse of what Democrats and Republicans argued about with Sarah Palin’s vetting process (too long, too short, etc.). In this case, however, confirmation hearings are a very public finale to a vetting process. Rather than whining about time frame, get to work preparing for it if you want to raise holy hell during that process.

But all of this boils down to one point: Senators (and Representatives, too) we elected you to esteemed positions to represent us in Washington, and to do what you can about the most important of issues. Stop wasting your time – and our tax dollars – at this crucial junction in history, and get to work on what will actually change the course of events.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

Trash - Won’t Pick It Up

June 8th, 2009

Starting July 14th, Baltimore is changing it’s trash collection schedule to only service neighborhoods once a week city wide.  The new law, signed by Mayor Dixon last week, has a number of lofty goals, including the obvious potential to save the city up to $7 million annually, according to The Baltimore Sun.  But the Sun also lists the administrations other goals for the bill:  more time for sanitation workers to attend to trash-filled alleys, encouraging a reliance on recycling, etc.

But here’s the run-down: it’s easy for the administration to change a law like this with utopian ideals, and leave the bulk of the work on the citizenry.  But we can only do so much.  The frequency of recycling and what can be recycled has to increase, or no matter what, we’re going to have overflowing trash spilling out of the alleys between row houses.  And I can imagine that when the budget continues to be hampered by the economy, my guess is one of the first things that gets cut is the frequency of these supposed alleyway sweeps.

So I applaud any efforts to continue to save money, and both green and clean our city.  But let’s be realistic: sanitation is a responsibility of a modern city, and if we’re going to once-a-week pickups, it’s up to Dixon and her crew to keep up their end of the bargain.  Otherwise I’m going to start leaving my trash at 100 N Holiday and let the Mayor take care of it.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

Take the Money and Run

June 4th, 2009

Let’s all say it together, children:  “Beggars can’t be choosers.”

It’s a simple enough lesson, really.  More than likely, most American children probably hear the phrase by a fairly early age.  Probably even earlier in the current economic times.

Apparently, no one mentioned that to South Carolina’s governor, Mark Sanford.

Sanford has been refusing to accept federal bailout money because of his qualms over the responsibility of the bailout.  He doesn’t agree with the policy, thinks it’s detrimental to the financial health of his state, the nation, etc.  It took a South Carolina Supreme Court ruling to convince him that he might be acting a wee bit stubborn.

This isn’t the time or the place in American history to be making political statements by refusing money.  The Obama administration isn’t selling child pornography, or running guns to vigilante countries, or distributing drugs on playgrounds, or any other heinous act that would require a stand against a helping hand.  And I can’t imagine anyone in South Carolina is doing so well that they can refuse $700 million to help their state*.  The fact of the matter is that South Carolina has two Senators and a handful of Representatives in Washington that cast their votes to represent the opinions of their hometown Carolinians, and Sanford needs to respect that and do his own job.  Want to be fiscally responsible?  How about not wasting your state Supreme Court’s time with trivial nonsense like this.

California sure wouldn’t turn down the cash.

*This line corrected.  It originally read “$7 billion.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon

The Straight and Narrow

June 3rd, 2009

It’s an odd time to live in America.  Despite the fact that the economy is in the tubes for everyone, there seems to be a great divide over the direction the country has taken since about, oh, let’s just use Nov. 4th as a random ‘plucked-from-a-hat’ date.  Half of the country (well, slightly less than half) thinks we’re bringing on the end of the world, that the Communists will overrun us all soon, and take away every last freedom we have.  The other, slightly-larger-than-half of the country is ecstatic, looking at a rebirth after eight years of political and social insanity, and the (ironically enough) removal and suppression of the freedoms we’re supposed to enjoy.

For the last eight years, dissent was traitorous.  The left was the ‘anti-‘ party, ‘anti-American’, ‘anti-Troops’, ‘anti-Freedom,’ according to those in power.  The dissenters dismissed their right-wing opponents as fascists, suppressors of free speech.  The setbacks we suffered at home and abroad in those years shaped the situation we find ourselves in today.  Slowly, the resentment against the direction our country was taking grew, and the balance of power shifted, first slightly in Congress in 2006, and then significantly – and very publicly – in 2008.  That day in November marks one of the greatest political and social swings in history.

But now we find with the new players in power, a strange thing is happening.  Dissent has once again become a bad thing.  Those that aren’t the political majority are “rooting for failure” by not just jumping on board with the new administrations plans (granted, a few are literally doing that, but we won’t dignify those people at the moment).  It seems as if the left has forgotten that for the last eight years, loud and vocal dissent was the only thing they had to keep their political voices in the mainstream.  They asked to be taken seriously and treated fairly, not insulted and ridiculed for their disagreements.

What a mess.  What a tragic, disgusting mess.

This blog is dedicated to dissent and free speech.  It will become very, very obvious very, very quickly that it leans very far to the left; but that doesn’t mean that for the next four years (minimum) there should be a moratorium on dissent.  It’s criticism that keeps us honest, and it’s honesty that keeps us striving for something better.  For those people who always dismissively said, “If you don’t like things in America, why don’t you move?” we respond, “This is my home.  And if I see something broken, I am going to try to fix it.”  That attitude shouldn’t change.  We shouldn’t become lax whether or not we like the people in power.  It’s up to us to keep our eyes pealed and our voices loud when we see something that isn’t right, or could be better.  And if those voices are honest, then we can expect to keep things on track.

So whether it’s national politics, Baltimore news, or something as simple as an opinion of the bar around the corner, expect to find an honest opinion here.

Welcome to The Baltimore Breakdown.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon